[abcdef123xyz]

An achievable option in the short term would be to do the following:

1) Fix the DCS issue as I suggested.

2) Check if the terminal supports SIXEL (there is a code in DA or DA2, or perhaps we need a flag).

3) If the terminal supports SIXEL, pass it through, if it doesn't then ignore it.

This would allow SIXEL to display on output although it would be corrupted as soon as tmux redraws. It would be a start however and could be added to tmux immediately.

[abcdef123xyz123]

You can try this:

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nicm/9acc00b67035b5f2b8a8...

Which does the basics of this:

- Bump the sequence timeout to 5 seconds instead of 100 ms for more time for SIXEL images but still not let the terminal hang forever. This could be made more sophisticated perhaps.

- Check the code in DA for SIXEL support and also check a terminfo(5) extension flag Sxl.

- Recognise SIXEL sequences and pass them through (like the 'tmux' passthrough escape sequence) and copy them to the attached outside terminals if they support SIXEL (DA or Sxl set).

I didn't try to disable the terminal-can't-keep-up code during DCS, that is more complicated because some panes may be inside DCS and some may not. I only have a small test SIXEL image so I would need a larger one that demonstrates the problem to look at that.

I probably won't move this any further forward unless someone tests this, but it may be a good start for further work on SIXEL.

[csdvrx]

Interesting, I will have a look and test it, thanks!

For images to test, on debian I recommend you install libsixel. You can then just use img2sixel to convert a jpg to sixel. Alternatively, install gnuplot-nox and:

export GNUTERM="sixelgd size 1280,720 truecolor font arial 16"

then you can test with various screen resolution and sizes, like:

echo plot sin(x) |gnuplot

Yes, my approach does not solves all problems. It is just a quick and dirty fix to show sixels in the current window because I use gnuplot very intensively on remote hosts. As soon as I switch to another pane, the output is lost. But I use plots mostly to get a quick idea of how things are going, every few minutes or hours.

About https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21646398 :

1. yes I do not check for sixel capacity. My approach is that any sequence I do not know about should be left as is, because it may have been made for a good reason, and there will always be newer sequences and terminals I don't know about. For graphics such as sixels, your approach to check for sixel capability might be better as they will need to be redrawn

2. what to do if there are 2 terminals attached is linked to #1. I would by default output the same sequence, because I do not touch what I do not know! If you are checking capabilities, it may be best to show an empty block of the same size at the place where the sixel output would be (a placeholder). Another option would be to use a converter like libcaca to turn the sixel into a rough ascii rendition. It would add a dependency to tmux, but also add a feature for terminals that can't keep up, here because they don't know how to interpret sixel

3. and 4. saving the sixel image is what mlterm does. You could save the .six files in ~/tmux/%PID%WIN%PANE

If you want to be consistent with text lines, you could keep all images until the text line after the sixel image is thrown out of the history.

[abcdef123xyz]

You can try the sixel branch in tmux - the top of the branch does some conversion and scaling (currently fits image to the pane and scales to the terminal xpixel/ypixel) so it might interfere too much but if you just took b34111b3 and d2e3f3c1 you would have plain passthrough (I might make a separate branch for that actually).

There is still a lot of work to do, I haven't decided if the best option would be to store all images in a big list and draw them separately when needed, or whether to mark the cells they cover and draw the SIXEL when the cell is drawn. SIXEL seems to have some strange behaviours and xterm seems to have a few bugs so I'm not sure how close to emulate everything - it might be better just to do it a sensible way. I don't think many applications will rely on being able to draw on top of SIXELs or have partial characters appear underneath.

I couldn't get img2sixel to generate the right colours, but convert from ImageMagick worked.