The "but its cruelty against animals so lets kill them instead!" card is a random and really worn out argument nowadays. We have enough of real problems yet.
Your suggestion gives your question the appearance of a not-so-honest question.
> What do you suggest then?
The answer would depend on your convictions. It could be one or a combination of, for example,
- Tight national and international regulations (with teeth) to ensure animal safety and well-being, comparable to the transport of humans,
- Local-only growth,
- Alternative protein start-ups,
- Etc.
> but its cruelty against animals so lets kill them instead!
I could not find any instances where the OP suggested this.
edit: Found someone else who mentioned that, which doesn't make sense to me either - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21637661
On the other hand,
> but its cruelty against animals
Then you would want to stop it in one way or another, no? What would be your suggestions?
The "but its cruelty against animals so lets kill them instead!" card is a random and really worn out argument nowadays. We have enough of real problems yet.