[try_again]

I'd wish that not every other article I read these days feels the need to focus on detecting misogyny or racism. It is absolutely important to identify the ways in which outdated world views led to injustices and move towards a brighter future but there's a fatigue setting in with it taking center stage in every discussion. Particularly troubling is the tendency towards wanting to separate the art from the artist whenever the artist held problematic views. It's a result of a cognitive dissonance setting in when you can see value or beauty in someone's work but don't agree with some aspects of that person. But the person behind the work is an integral part of it and vice-versa. If you hold someone's output in high regard but find objectionable fragments in it or in their life story you can't just go dissecting it into those pieces you wish to keep and discard the rest. I guess what irks me is the classification of Lawrence's essays as "indefensible". A view can be troublesome, even reprehensible, but to deny it representation by calling it indefensible is setting up a dangerous precedent where anyone can be silenced or their opinions simply cherry-picked to find what fits our desires. And that's no different than the biases that are railed against.