|
|
|
|
|
|
by andymockli
2401 days ago
|
|
|
I'd personally categorize Paul Krugman as an idealogue. You might think the same of Bob Murphy and Tom Woods, but the aim was to offer a counterpoint to Krugman's ideas. I believe you'd find the intellectual engagement and critiques within the podcast, not the subtitle. |
|
|
No, I doubt it. If they think they can refute [1] like clockwork future columns they've never seen, it's almost certain they're just rehashing dogmas for the faithful. I have better things to spend my time on than that.
[1] a very strong word, by the way