Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kej 2401 days ago
Your application is "infected" if you use Qt without a commercial license, regardless of how you link it. It's a little harder (but still possible) to comply with the LGPL requirements when you statically link, but you are bound to those requirements either way.
2 comments

Pretty sure having it dynamically linked is ok with the open source licence
Right, my point is that static linking is also okay with the LGPL, albeit slightly more difficult in terms of what you have to make available to end users.
I believe the parent post is correct and mechanism used to link effects the licence.