[sdegutis]

What kind of broken logic can conclude that this is the extent of my “scope” from what I said? An easier conclusion to arrive at is that I figure it’s one of the few memes we probably have in common, and chose it because memes are an excellent source of connotations.

[0db532a0]

You're right to an extent. I absolutely believe in the utility of humour and satire as ways of illustrating certain ideas and forcing people to think. People on HN especially are much too prudish. These forms can be a lot more effective than a long piece of text.

What I mean, though, is that there's only so much information that a piece of humour or a comic strip can convey.

Also, you have to consider the crowd that xkcd caters to, and the crowd that typical American geek humour such as Big Bang Theory caters to in general.

Existentialism/Nihilism are common themes in geek humour, but negatively: these ideas are quick to be dismissed as edge-lording, and as 8-chan-incelling.

Geek culture and morality relies wholly on the self-supporting idea of science as the one and only source of truth. The geek's first reaction will of course be to dismiss any claim to the contrary, in humour and otherwise.

[sdegutis]

Four other sources of truth I suggest you check out if you really like truth:

http://www.newadvent.com/fathers/index.html

http://www.newadvent.com/summa/

http://www.newadvent.com/cathen/index.html

http://www.newadvent.com/bible/gen001.htm

[0db532a0]

Have a look into Nietzsche's master-slave morality distinction, and how Christianity falls into it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_morality. This page is a very short read.

[sdegutis]

Jesus rose from the dead, that's a lot more reason to believe what he said than in Nietzsche's powerless words.

[0db532a0]

I think I'm going to turn the other cheek on this discussion.