|
|
|
|
|
by agentultra
2399 days ago
|
|
Teaching our kids about Siri and Alexa... and how to subvert it. By not participating. Reading books. Enjoying time together at a park. Finding mirth in games and late night conversations. By teaching them to pick up their own groceries, shop local, use the library, see local performances, and enjoying our neighbourhood. If 2010’s were all about staying in and binging on Netflix I hope the next decade will be about getting out and letting our computers gather dust. |
|
"Where a home just has one of these [AI / connected home]. Like an in-sink trash disposal, or an answering machine."
Consider phones. In the early 2000's, most people had a cell phone. By 2010, most people have a smart phone. These devices are much more capable than their predecessors. I've read books (Hans Rosling, Factfulness) that suggested communities with access to smartphones have a 3% GDP increase over communities with cell phones. That number may seem small, but remember it's a global scale. 3% is a significant amount.
The current state of AI is where cell phones were 20 years ago. We may get to a point where not using AI (as you said, "not participating") may put yourself at a clear disadvantage - you will not be as capable as your peers.
It's sort of like those 50-60 year olds in the workforce who refuse to use a computer. They've always done their job a particular way, but they are not as productive as some of the younger hires who use computers. Then they are shocked when they are laid off - their current (disadvantaged) output is far below what is expected, since technology has become ubiquitous and people expect you to be able to use a computer to do your job.