| > 1. Proof of stake. This has yet to be proven, and as you say, there’s reasons why it has yet to land. I give this one vitaliks sideways smiley face. > 2. You can't -- this is a cultural problem, not a technological one Uh, one that doesn’t exist in the current financial system. I’m sure y’all will find a way. As I said, it’s a prerequisite. > 3. There’s no such thing as money laundering. Hilarious. I see someone never took compliance training at work. With that attitude I’d love to see you explain your position to a judge. Money laundering is literally financial transactions arranged in such a way as to conceal the original source of funds. > 4. Buzzword soup. > 5. More buzzword soup. More buzzword soup that immediately falls down as once you use crypto as only a bulk transport instrument you’ve lost out on all its ostensible benefits. No transparency, no security, it’s no better than just using a wire transfer. |
I though anonymity and legal safeharbour were founding principles of cryptocurrency? The original comment is correct that what we call money laundering is an artificial construct of power.