Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Animats 2405 days ago
OK, how about "Uber for toilets"? Clean a toilet, get paid. Cameras and machine learning to check what a clean and dirty toilet look like. Sign up, and you get access to cleaning supplies and can turn the hose on. Works like retrieving dockless scooters.
2 comments

What's wrong with the city/state having properly paid employees doing the cleaning? Why the need to create _more_ precarious typically underpaid jobs?

I really don't get it.

Because then you get massively overpaid jobs with no oversight, which taxpayers are forced to fund. [1]

SF already has massive taxes and too many overpaid workers, and the city is still a mess. There is no accountability. Throwing more money at it is not going to help.

> San Francisco’s budget totals an astounding $9.6 billion this year — more than the budgets of 13 states and scores of countries around the world [2]

> By far the biggest chunk goes to pay city employees. Almost half — $4.7 billion — is spent on the salaries and benefits of 30,626 city employees.

[1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/04/how-one-bay-area-janitor-mad...

[2]: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Billions-of-doll...

> Clean a toilet

for that you really need to have the toilets to begin with. SF, and in general American cities, have no public toilets ( i mean the number they have is just a noise around 0).