[PavlovsCat]

> You realize that we are talking about Google, right?

The context is "disagreeing with unions", which wasn't further qualified.

edit: and certainly not restricted to Google. Just re-read chrisseaton's comment -- downvoting me doesn't change what's written here, it just adds the data point of dishonesty and underhanded tactics.

> These examples are hilarious, but also a little insulting to employees who actually need unions.

How so?