Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Havoc 2398 days ago
Congrats on finding a way to circumvent the letter of the law.

Think they're about to have an harsh encounter with spirit of the law & European thinking about privacy & consent though.

3 comments

Yup, agreed.

IANAL, but my impression of the US legal system vs various (continental) Europe legal systems is the former is completely engrossed with the letter of the law while the latter is much more focused on the spirit of the law.

If FB gets shafted in the processs of discovering this fact of life, all the better.

At the very least, from a "I expect the worst from my government" skeptic POV, one could see this as a good shakedown opportunity from Facebook for massive fines.

The only reason that doesn't happen is either fear of FB or corruption.

facebook is probably laughing harder at this. A few billion in fines, combined with low irish taxation is still not big enough to justify pulling out of the EU market. The EU decided a bit too late to build a chinese-style 'firewall' around european tech and it's not really working. Instead they are playing cat and mouse with big corp, which really shows that these laws were mainly meant to have an apotropaeic effect
>The EU decided a bit too late to

Probably. They're the only big guys making a credible effort though. Russia/China won't be doing anything. US & associated lobbying basically IS big tech now.

...leaving just the EU.

china already has her own internet ecosystem. Russia has VK,yandex,mail.ru etc. EU has nothing

https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/CN

https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/RU

https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/DE

Ah yes, requiring user consent is exactly the same thing as censoring information not beneficial to the government.
i don't really mean a censorship firewall, rather an attempt to shoo US companies from the EU market the same way that China is protecting its own companies.
So EU companies are allowed to ignore GDPR, as it's just used to shoo away US companies?
no they re not, which is why this kind of "firewalling" is stupid
What kind of a fucking firewall is it now? It's not for censorship, it's not for preferential treatment. You keep calling a firewall but can't say what it actually does.