Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by snagglegaggle 2403 days ago
Most issues are in old implementations and on Windows, so it's not completely off base.
1 comments

Sure, but there is no way this should be used as a reference in 2019. It was wrong even in 2003 when it was written - Unicode 3.0 from 1999 defined the maximum number of code points, surrogate pairs, and code points above U+FFFF.

His single most important fact still rings true though, "It does not make sense to have a string without knowing what encoding it uses."