It's not at all flippant when one side describes the benefits but not the costs. If it was marketed accurately, I wouldn't call it the free stuff platform. But then if it was marketed accurately you wouldn't have the majority of people thinking that medicare for all was really a public option proposal, or Kamala Harris throwing smoke in people's eyes by simultaneously distancing herself from medicare for all while also advocating for it. Let's be honest about the level of honesty here.