[ThomPete]

I don't think any would claim otherwise.

But you don't need objective for that all you need is useful.

[derleth]

Except if some people think science is not objective, they conclude that religion is just as valid, and that, therefore, Creationism (er, Creation 'Science') needs to be taught in schools alongside the 'fact' that gays and liberals are evil, diseased beings. After all, if it's all subjective, everything is equally valid!

[ThomPete]

Science isn't objective as such. It's testable.

That is the defining factor between religion and science.