|
|
|
|
|
|
by arminiusreturns
2407 days ago
|
|
|
Each has a use case. dnsmasq has an easier barrier to entry, so I have seen people use it during prototyping before implimenting unbound/powerdns/bind etc, but often those can be much more complicated setups. Most edge routers provided by ISP's are running dnsmasq on the underside. |
|
|
I'd say opposite
It had less examples and docs compare to unbound. At least that was my reason to setup unbound 2 years ago
>Most edge routers provided by ISP's are running dnsmasq on the underside.
True and sad