|
|
|
|
|
|
by MaxBarraclough
2411 days ago
|
|
|
I agree that both problems are worth analysing, even if they're both absurd. Same goes for the Hangman's Paradox, a personal favourite. [0] I gather that Pascal had never intended Pascal's Wager to be a watertight argument, it was intended more as a plaything for showing how unlikely it was anyone could make a watertight case for the existence of God. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangman%27s_Paradox |
|
|