|
|
|
|
|
by maest
2409 days ago
|
|
I thought the "solution" for St Peteresburg paradox was to consider utility as a non-linear function of wealth. And this makes the series converge. Also, I don't find the Pascal's Mugger example convincing, as the probability that the mugger will return with the money is inversely proportional to the multiple they are promissing (for very large multiples this is because they have finite resources, but even at lower multiples this intuitively feels true). |
|
That can't be reasonably estimated though. Putting aside the fact that we can't really assert the relation you posit, there is also a finite probability that the mugger is some sort of illuminati member with the ability to create an arbitrary amount of money. Ie, there is some tiny-but-positive probability that he can create an arbitrary amount of money.
At that point, the expected return can be made large compared to the probability that the mugger is lying.