Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by transreal 2401 days ago
This is the trouble with Google's aggressive auto-update policy. "Everyone is always on the latest" is mandated because everyone should have the latest security updates, but it works great except when it doesn't.

Another example is a recent issue where a Chrome update broke WebView based Android apps and stopped them from being able to make certain types of network requests. It was fixed in 2 weeks, but that 2 week period was full of unhappy customers and lost revenue.

I'm hoping the upcoming Chromium based Edge from Microsoft will allow IT Admins to control when a browser update is rolled out and give them more control over the update process.

Chrome auto-updates can be disabled for networks behind a firewall by blocking the update server address, but that's a very crude way, and doesn't allow for updating a test machine to see how the new version works, or updating to the latest minus 1 version.

3 comments

This is not about auto-updates. Organizations which had disabled auto-updates were still affected. In this case Google changed Chrome behavior without changing the release version. That’s absolutely unacceptable.
Couldn’t one setup to use Chrome Enterprise with group plolicy rules on when certain updates can happen?
You could whitelist the test machine