Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SignalsFromBob 2413 days ago
I suspect that someone, or a group of people, will step up to unofficially maintain Python 2 for the foreseeable future. It's clear that there are a lot of people using it that either can't easily migrate or are unwilling to do so for the various reasons already discussed in this thread.
2 comments

I'm sure that for the right money you can find someone.

Don't forget that that person/organization would not only have to maintain python but also all the packages that you will be used.

If I encounter Python 2 bugs that matter to me, I can and will fix them myself if needed, and submit or otherwise publish the change.

I'm quite certain I'm not the only one.

Why not just migrate to 3?

genuinely curious...

Because of the amount of work involved in porting my existing Python code. Python 3 doesn't offer any advantages that matter to me, so that's a lot of effort for little gain.
OK, thanks. Good luck with the bug fixing ;)
I'm not really worried about bugs, because the code I have works well, and I doubt I'm going to do any serious new Python 2 development.
I meant the bugs in your dependencies that you'll have to backport fixes to. But hey, if you're writing bug-free code that'll be easy ;)