|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway5752
2412 days ago
|
|
A few points 1. heme vs non-heme absorption is different 1. vegetarians and vegans do not have a high incidence of iron-deficiency induced anemia 3. plant base sources of food often have higher iron density that animal sources (tofu vs lean ground beef - it surprises people that tofu has substantially more iron) 4. too much iron can be harmful and the body lacks means of excreting excess: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839665/ |
|
What matters is the "effective density" or, for a given gm of food, how many mg of Fe does your body take from it?
4. " too much iron can be harmful"
Indeed. And very many fascinating studies are coming out associating Fe with very many modern ailments (the modern post-industrial age fellow eating meat in excess).
Women do excrete quite a bit of it though and they, and growing kids, need iron.
2. I'm not doubting that vegans can be healthy, but its not universally true. There are people who cannot absorb non animal sourced iron. these people don't stay vegans for very long (they either die, or quit). Either way, those who cannot absorb iron don't stay in in the vegan pool [0].
I'm guessing your link refers to this point. The study is culturally dependent (a study on healthy Chinese men eating real Chinese food).
Also, non-healthy people didn't get recruited to the study (therefore selecting the sample for people who can absorb vegetable iron)
[0] This point is important. Let's say you have a group of people which includes people with weak-ish livers. These people feel sick when their livers are stressed.
Now you do a study on the effects of moderate alcohol consumption vs. total abstinence. The people who feel ill when their livers are stressed are, all else being equal, more likely to be teetotalers.
Well your sample of moderate drinkers now, on the whole, are being drawn from a healthier population. This skews your result.