|
|
|
|
|
|
by jhayward
2412 days ago
|
|
|
> The point is that even MDACC figured out is was too expensive to continue their own EMR. I think then that the example does not prove your point. It would have been vastly better, financially and medically, for MDACC to have continued with their in-house EMR. |
|
|
...until they (too) fall victim to "a rogue engineer" (or a "patient") coming in and plugging something into an open USB port on the workstation.