|
|
|
|
|
by mato
2411 days ago
|
|
> "Of the top 100 vulnerabilities reported for QEMU: > - 65 were not guest exploitable > [...] Which leaves about 30 that presumably were guest exploitable. Don't get me wrong -- QEMU is useful. As a "kitchen sink" solution that runs anything, anywhere, with any useful combination of emulated {devices,processors,systems}. However, this is also its biggest weakness. Which is why Google and Amazon all run their own custom VMMs for their IaaS services. The microvm machine type as described here is a great step to improve this situation. The next step in my book would be to reconfigure QEMU's build system to allow building a binary that only supports the devices provided by microvm, and nothing else. |
|