|
|
|
|
|
by JamesBarney
2423 days ago
|
|
1) You can 100% meet your basic needs(in the !Kung sense) working 15-20 hrs/week. I imagine most Kung live with their family, don't have healthcare, no climate control, walk everywhere. Clothing, food and a place to live is not that expensive. A part time service job would give you about ~$700/month, which is more than enough to meet these basic needs. You could rent a room for as little as $200, live on $35/week on food, and easily be clothed $20/month. 2) We benefit by having more stuff, not working less. 3) It is definitely more efficient. You couldn't support anywhere near the world's population based on !Kung style hunting/gathering. |
|
Do those $35 a week get you a healthy meal? Or will you eventually develop malnutrition? I live in a mid-sized city in UK, and back in my student days I rented a room for ~$300. It had rats, mould, and a leaking roof.
Those people raised a family while working 20 hrs/week. Are you going to feed and house your kids with that part-time service job?
Maybe you can, but that's not the point. After 4,000 of progress, the difference should be so vast, that the two experiences are totally incomparable.
Since those barbaric days productivity went up over 10,000%, I should be able to survive working 2 hours a year!