[_y5hn]

Perfect case to hold the administration personally accountable.

[bdcravens]

By “administration”, are you referring to the office of the POTUS? I bash that office as much as any, but this is a state level issue, and even at the national level, it would be a judicial, not an executive, branch concern.

[colechristensen]

Notice you're assuming the parent's reference and then saying it is wrong.

[bdcravens]

There's an implicit "if" there, but perhaps I could have made that clearer.

[_y5hn]

Someone is in charge of the office "just following orders" and not questioning authority. That office should be accountable.

Thanks to OP who spotted this.