[genidoi]

It's interesting how the first paragraph in particular reads like a deflection of the original question, somewhat akin to a middle manager avoiding exposing their lack of domain expertise in response to a technical question by giving a vague answer.

There were heaps of semantic pathways the network could have chosen such as guessing what a borrower is, or maybe even weighing the significance of "borrower" more than rust in the original question because it has no clue what rust+borrower is; but it instead picked the safer option of deflection. Fascinating stuff.

[JetSpiegel]

Pattern matching on noise yields false positives, more news at 11.