Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by einpoklum 2426 days ago
Skewed analysis. It assumes:

1. No energy savings.

2. No carbon sequestration.

Now, I'm no expert on either of these, but both are of extreme importance to achieving emission reduction goals, and there is huge potential for such reductions.

1 comments

Sue but even if those two factors cut the problem in half (they won't) we still can't build at this lower rate. Oil consumption and electrical needs are projected to rise during the next thirty years.
At least for energy use it turns out that the problem is cut in half!

https://medium.com/otherlab-news/decarbonization-and-gnd-b8d...

“The mere act of electrification has a powerful effect on efficiency: electrifying the US economy from carbon free sources will reduce the amount of energy needed by more than half.”

They will cut the problem by much more than a half.