|
|
|
|
|
by sarchertech
2420 days ago
|
|
Then you can't use those places to generalize Atlanta. The fact is Atlanta isn't adding housing fast enough to keep up with demand. That is the same problem San Fransisco has. It's just not nearly as bad. >If you own a house you wouldn’t want the value to meet inflation every year. You want it to gain value. Of course. That's a huge part of the of the problem. Housing can't be both a good investment and affordable. You've basically summed up NIMBYism in 2 sentences. >Atlanta is a very affordable city by any measure It is currently more affordable than some cities less affordable than others. But if housing prices keep outpacing inflation and more importantly wage growth, it won't be affordable for long. |
|
There’s only one time in the past 30 years where housing prices dropped and people lost money. It wasn’t because of NIMBYism.
[1] https://www.ajc.com/business/real-estate/atlanta-pending-hom...
[2] https://www.ajc.com/business/atlanta-wages-but-not-fast-hous...