|
|
|
|
|
by AdamJacobMuller
2420 days ago
|
|
It's theft of service. Remember as abstract as the law can be, the legal system is not going to be amused by contrivances like "they were offering DNS service free and clear, so tunneling youtube over DNS is fine" The legal system is going to understand that you were trying to circumvent paying for services and treat it appropriately. |
|
This isn't like bypassing the electrical grid by running your own line from somebody else's service.
This is like saying it's theft of service to read a chapter in the bookstore. If you hang out there all day, you might get kicked out, but that's not a crime.
The courts might agree with you, but only because "computers are hard".
There's a world of difference between tunneling over DNS and compromising servers. Or at least, there should be.