|
|
|
|
|
by chx
2427 days ago
|
|
This is a solved problem, really, some banks are less keen on implementing it: generate single use / single purpose credit card numbers in your ebank / mobile app. Leaks are total useless. Also, more than a decade ago already many European banks were sending a text SMS above a treshold and only approved on a positive reply. Today you'd likely offer sending a push notification. You have 16 digits on a Visa/MasterCard, the first six is the bank identifier and the last is a checksum digit thus you have 9 digits to "waste" -- and you can recycle them. |
|
The impression I've gotten is that since most of the costs of fraud are on the bank, rather than the cardholder, there's not much incentive for the cardholder to go through the trouble of using single-use cards. And so it's a better investment for the bank to develop good fraud detection algorithms.
In my anecdotal experience, the fraud detection has gotten really good. Every time in the past decade that someone's gotten hold of my credit card number, the bank's caught it nearly immediately.