Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tudorw 2432 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's trying to say that deep learning as it stands is modeled on one aspect of a model of the brain, by developing out the 3 aspects they identify and having them act in unison would be potentially a good thing, disclaimer, I am neither a neuroscientist nor deep learning expert!
1 comments

What I understood is that they're saying deep learning relies on understanding neural processing in 3 parts: objective functions (activation functions maybe?), learning rules (I guess like back-prop/gradient descent?) and architecture (I assume network structure)?

So it sounds like they want to use this componentization of neural processing to try to understand biological neural networks better.

The objective function is the entire function the network is training toward, i.e. in a classification task it's the correct mapping of images to labels. The idea here is that real brains also optimize their weights to compute certain useful objective functions.