| To add to my previous answer: > While AWS has ruffled a bunch of feathers with their Elasticsearch and Kafka managed offerings which can be easily construed as attempts to steam roll the respective open source-first entities, I am actually quite impressed by the mechanism that Azure has employed with Azure Managed Applications: Here ( https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B01N6YCISK?qid=1572333... ) is Elastic Co's ElasticSearch SaaS offering on AWS:
> Elasticsearch Service on Elastic Cloud
> Sold by:Elasticsearch Inc.
> The official hosted Elasticsearch & Kibana offering on AWS. Launch, manage, monitor and secure Elasticsearch and Kibana deployments with the latest versions, and add machine learning and powerful hot-warm architecture with optimized templates. The other popular product/software to hate on AWS about is MongoDB, which we find here: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B077D557RX?qid=1572333... > MongoDB Atlas for AWS
> Sold by:MongoDB
> MongoDB Atlas delivers the world's leading database for modern applications as a fully automated cloud service with operational and security best practices built in. Easily deploy, operate, and scale MongoDB on AWS by letting Atlas take care of time-consuming administration tasks. I haven't used any of these, but the reviews seem to show that people are running them. So, your assertion that Azure has shown creativity, when AWS launched the ability for partners to offer SaaS solutions on AWS (with recent improvements such as PrivateLink to allow SaaS partners to offer managed services inside customer VPCs) 2 years before Azure indicates that seem to not be familiar enough with AWS to be making these statements. |