|
|
|
|
|
by erentz
2426 days ago
|
|
Part of it is based on previous experience working for the national grid in a hydro rich 80-90% clean generating country. I can’t speak specifically for the US but think about it like this. You need to have enough generating capacity on your grid to meet the peak demand. Which according to this duck graph is when solar is not generating. But we have not overbuilt capacity by some large margin. And hydro is only some portion of that total capacity today. The rest is coal, nuclear, increasingly gas, and some small amount of renewables. Therefore how can hydro alone meet the all of the demand when you remove the goal, gas, etc. |
|
I had a look at https://www.transpower.co.nz/power-system-live-data
And that showed hydro was running at less than 50% of capacity for one relevant data point.
I am guessing the data series of hydro usage versus capacity is available for NZ. Finding out the constraints and understanding them is more difficult.
Your point of maximum capacity may be true, but we are talking usual daily usage (duck graph) and whether solar can use hydro for that.
In think you are arguing about occasional peak network capacity (e.g. heat wave) which is an outlier and you retain power stations with extremely low utilisations for those abnormal peaks (and ignore green issues).