Folks who say this assume they have a right to someone else's labor aka slavery
Completely nonsense in a modern society.
If you read the article I posted, you'd see that your cursory objection is thoroughly false:
> Proudhon was clear that his opposition to property did not extend to exclusive possession of labor-made wealth.
If you read the article I posted, you'd see that your cursory objection is thoroughly false:
> Proudhon was clear that his opposition to property did not extend to exclusive possession of labor-made wealth.