Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lbeltrame 2433 days ago
> It's a perfectly fine and useful way to make a cross-platform desktop application.

My main problems with Electron are:

- The size of the runtime

- The fact that every application has to bundle it and it means that multiple Electron applications on the same system do consume a lot of resources if not handled well

- The fact that unless you (as a developer) play due diligence, you might distribute your app with a version of the runtime which may contain vulnerabilities (one of the reasons Linux distributions don't like library bundling that much).

I can't deny it's probably easier for many (not for me, but although I write Python code all day, I'm by no means a "developer"), but it can be potentially wasteful, to say the least, and require far more resources than what you'd actually need with a another toolkit.

That said I for sure won't point a gun at someone who wants to use it. ;)

1 comments

This comment is so beautifully in-character for the thread, and completely fulfills OPs characterization of people that "do indeed seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time bickering about which popular apps best fulfill their purity tests".
If they didn't care about software they'd just use whatever came pre installed on their computer
We are here because we are deeply interested the software that we're using. If one group of programs does something that tends to suck, then we're going to call it out.
Just remember, you get what you pay for.
To be honest I spent at best 3 minutes writing that post; compared to the time I put in FOSS projects...