|
|
|
|
|
by oil25
2427 days ago
|
|
> For some of us, security == anonymity. I don't follow. How is security equal to anonymity? If anything, security is what enables privacy, which could enable anonymity. There are plenty of circumstances where you need security, but not anonymity - for example a message to your partner. Of course if you do need anonymity, there's a lot more involved than simply installing a "secure app" or anything of that sort. > Tying your identity to a phone number that can only be obtained by handing a telecom your government identity documents fails. I don't know about that in the US. I was able to open a pre-paid T-Mobile account to use with my LineageOS Android device without identity verification. Perhaps it is different elsewhere now? > And I don't know if anyone else has mentioned this, but uploading entire contact lists should also not be considered a natural feature of a secure mobile messenger. That sounds troubling, is it what Signal does? Would like to read more about that - is there a Github issue for reference? |
|