[jrcii]

Why would there be a “discussion”? They knew their users didn’t want this anti-feature before they implemented it and they did it anyway.

Then they add insult to injury by pretending to “discuss” it as if user consent or participation has anything to do with this.

[emilycook]

We have been taking the feedback seriously, we rolled back our ToS changes and are reconsidering our approach here. More info can be found on the issue