[rolltiide]

ah yes the classic "but which symbolism" rebuttal. predictable, there are great plot points, but ultimately there is no deeper meaning to a lot of it. There are crosses for the sake of crosses, and there are crucifixions for the sake of crucifixions, there are crosses popping out of forehead vagina eye sockets for the sake of crosses popping out of forehead vagina eye sockets

[cthalupa]

I mean, your comment doesn't really deserve a real rebuttal. You just state something as fact without any supporting evidence.

At least the person replying provided some evidence to their counter-claim.

I have no idea who is right, but you're not making anything close to an argument for your point here.