Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mgkimsal 5622 days ago
Even if the court decides in your favor, all you have is a judgement. You still have to collect. If they didn't pay before, why would they pay now? With a judgement, you have a better chance of getting your money, but not any better chance of getting it quickly. It may still take years (this from someone who's been waiting 2.5 years after filing a lawsuit to have my case heard - courts are really backed up).
1 comments

Yes, winning usually still means you usually don't get paid.

http://www.sptimes.com/Hillsborough/90698/Small_claims_usual...

"Only 8 percent of those winning plaintiffs collected, court records show. Officials say some plaintiffs might not have notified the court, so as a backup test, the Times contacted 39 winning plaintiffs. Eight -- 21 percent -- said they had been paid.

Court officials nationwide confirm that whatever the real number is, it's low.

"Most plaintiffs would be better off taking their money to the roulette tables in Biloxi, Miss., and placing it on red," said Jimmy Dye, a collections lawyer who works throughout Florida. "They'd certainly have more fun." "

Go on Judge Judy or something. The TV shows will actually pay you if you win.

They actually pay you regardless of the verdict.