|
|
|
|
|
by triffidhunter
5627 days ago
|
|
> I was with you until here. T'so is quoted as writing that btrfs has a lot of the same design ideas of ReiserFS, When I was using reiserfs years ago, it ate all my data (/home unraveled). I like the features, and it was nice and fast for the time but I've held a grudge against it for years as a result. Looking at dumps of the on disk data structures showed massive corruption. At work, we used it for a long time in a project where tail-packing is a huge win (many many small files). Never had any problems there. So, it doesn't really suck I just had a bad experience. |
|