Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ksec 2436 days ago
>So isnt this a recapitalization of the firm? Why would they need to pay $200M for control if the alternative is some variation of bankruptcy followed by a firesale and cheap buy?

Because it is obvious if they do Firesale and Cheap buy they would have destroy the company and buy something that everyone knows isn't remotely worth that much. By trying to save it now they could at least get back some of its investment via IPO.

My question is what if Neumann decides to be an ass, and just want to watch everything burn? After all he has the voting shares.
1 comments
dodobirdlord 2435 days ago
They could probably sue him. As a member of the board of directors he still has an obligation to act in the interests of the shareholders even if he controls a majority of the votes.
link
ksec 2435 days ago
Wow, so it turns there is a difference between Majority of shares (50%+) and Majority of Voting Power.

So hypnotically could he have done it if he had 50%+ vote? Or could he still be sued? And by watching everything burn, I mean he could try to spin it as he will take drastic action to improve on the situation and refuse Softbank's offer.

link
dodobirdlord 2434 days ago
> So hypnotically could he have done it if he had 50%+ vote? Or could he still be sued?

Could still be sued.

> And by watching everything burn, I mean he could try to spin it as he will take drastic action to improve on the situation and refuse Softbank's offer.

Having a spin can help in court, but a court is likely to see through it.

link