Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by berns 2438 days ago
> Is there a plausible explanation why egress fees from cloud providers costs around $0.1/GB?

Isn't DigitalOcean a cloud provider ($0.01/GB)?. Isn't Oracle a cloud provider (first 10 TB free, $ 0.0085 after)? Isn't OVH a cloud provider (free bandwidth)?
2 comments
dx034 2437 days ago
Which means higher pricing at GCP/AWS/Azure can't be explained by higher availability, DO offers the same.
link
semiotagonal 2438 days ago
Unless I'm making a mistake someplace, Digital Ocean includes 1TB egress to the internet from a $5-per-month host. On Google Cloud Platform that egress would cost $120/month by itself.

https://www.digitalocean.com/pricing/#Compute

https://cloud.google.com/compute/network-pricing

link
privateSFacct 2437 days ago
What you find is if you spin up 1000 of these $5 hosts (ie, $5000 per month which is pretty) and try to egress 1PB per month you can't. Either they disconnect you, the systems can't actually handle it or some other gimmick.

One thing folks like about AWS - you can actually know what you will be paying and there is no fake / hidden limits.

That's my somewhat outdated experience wasting a TON of time on this idea ages ago.

link
Dylan16807 2436 days ago
But going back to the original number of $0.01/GB, that's what they state upfront as a bandwidth overage cost. I would be very surprised if they disliked customers paying the overage fee. And that's still only $10k per petabyte, vastly cheaper than AWS.

Give them a warning if you're going to spike your bill that high, but there shouldn't be any fake/hidden limits.

link