[vneur]

Can this clickbait title be fixed? This is a news article covering a review. The review suggests that the (small) cognitive effects of caffeine and other things present in chocolate have mechanisms that are starting to be understood, in rodents.

Because it's a review it provides no new evidence unlike the implication in the title. Instead, it's suggesting possible neural pathways for why the cognitive effects might exist.

[dang]

I've taken a crack at a more accurate and neutral title. If anyone suggests a better one, we can change it again.