|
|
|
|
|
by scarface74
2435 days ago
|
|
What do you think happens to “social programs” aimed at families if the government defines a family as a man and a woman and not a gay couple? Or less than 50 years ago as a man and a woman of the same race? These are the same “social programs” that treat drug abuse as a “disease” in rural America but as something to be at “War” with in the inner city. We can even go as far as the same people who hate “subsidies” when it applies to health care love it to prop up farmers. Even the EPA is more concerned with protecting the affluent neighborhoods than Flint Michigan. The government has proven time and again that it can’t be trusted to do anything fairly. |
|
And from this your conclusion is to put lead back into gasoline.
> The government has proven time and again that it can’t be trusted to do anything fairly.
...therefore we shouldn't worry about monopolies, and do nothing about corporate abuses? If you're going to say "vote with your wallet", let me remind you this is known not to work [1].
[1] https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/02/22/repost-the-non-liberta... especially point 2.3.1. But you'd probably benefit from reading all of it.