[aguilar]

I've been reading top HN posts for a few years now and recently started reading a little more of the comments. My personal impressions are that here we have a good and precise moderation. What makes me think this way is that I mostly remember reading deep, reasonable, authentic and specific comments and discussion, even in long lists of comments - different from some other forums / channels where it might be more common to see hateful, toxic comments. Is it a good moderation or the public here is more polite? Or both, maybe? What I see in this post here is a lot of offensive accusations and supposed constatation, without examples, evidence or even a narrative of facts that led to this rage and indignation... In my perception a clear example of post that is not useful, not following the guideline and doesn't promote any improve. I feel sorry you feel this way about the moderation here, but I suggest you deeply analyse yourself first.