| > If any rule/law = "authoritarian regime" to you I think we can't stop the discussion now and save us both some time. Can you quote where I said anything about a "regime"? > Google is free to handle its playstore as it please as long as it follow the law, Which is true, but completely besides the point? I am free to call you a clueless asshole. But if the discussion is about how to have a constructive dialog, me pointing out that I am free to call you a clueless asshole contributes exactly nothing to the conversation and at best shows that I have no clue what the discussion is about. > I doubt google will pull a genocide anytime soon. Your point being? Authoritarianism is good when it's not a genocide, because ... ? > Setting boundaries/rules doesn't make you an authoritarian regime. Again: Where did you pull that "regime" from? And also, no, "setting boundaries/rules" does not make for authoritarianism, that is correct. Why did you assume that I wasn't aware of that? > If you want to pull the "this reminds me of the darkest hours of our history" card you better find something more important than an app removal from a mobile phone app store if you want to be taken seriously. Why? And no, simply pointing out that one thing is worse than the other is not a relevant argument, that's simply straw manning, because noone claimed that one was as bad as the other. |