|
|
|
|
|
|
by ModelTheorist12
2439 days ago
|
|
|
Furthermore you are arguing my point. Relativism. >some things are more correct than others. On the relative scale of "very incorrect" to "very correct" descriptions of Earth's shape where does "real" start? In relation to the geodesic systems (e.g ETRS89, NAD, WGS84 ) "round" is a very imprecise description of Earth's shape. Is WSG84 more 'real' than ETRS89? |
|
|