| The human approach is the one that gets most people out of poverty and into the middle class so they can deal with the consequences of the climate which we always will have to deal with and always have had to deal with. The most predictable way of doing that is allowing them to use cheap reliable energy. Mass starvation happens when you don't have cheap reliable energy, pesticides and other modern technologies to deal with the always ongoing consequences of climate change. Civil unrest is what happens when people don't have access to food, right now the only societies that can ensure that are rich societies using capitalism, technology, and energy (mostly fossil fuels) to deal with that. Mass migration happens all the time but again it's more likely to happen when you don't have the means to defend you against the always occuring challenges of the climate. It's anti-human to hinder poor people getting access to the very resource that allow them to fight the consequences of climate change like we are able to in modern societies. Nature doesn't give us a safe and friendly environment we make unsafe, it gives us a hostile and dangerous enviroment we make safe through the use of energy. My approach is pro human flourishing. So "deal with" means allowing humans to deal the challenges of nature. |