|
|
|
|
|
by eecsninja
2435 days ago
|
|
The problem is that large organizations like government agencies and corporations don't want alternate opinions, except in the rare cases where they specifically have a devil's advocate position to test the validity of ideas. Better performance isn't an argument that sways these organizations that care more about preserving the status quo than about success in their stated goals. |
|
One program I work with has a few clearly defined tasks they've basically mastered. They're very open to my ideas and critiques. Another program was required to overhaul their planning process. It was part of the grant which provided most of their funding. It was harder to debate decisions, because everything needed to move lock-step to make the deadline. It surprised me, because they're usually more receptive to my advice.
They feared failure more than non-optimal success. This can happen in large and small organizations.