|
|
|
|
|
by davout
2435 days ago
|
|
There are many cases where asking the beneficiary is not necessary, fraud is only one of them. And to clarify, it's not really "fraud", it's "claim by the originator that a fraud occurred". Which is a very different thing, and which matters immensely in practice. |
|
In both of those cases, the beneficiary bank is not even required to send the funds back. It can require consent from the beneficiary (which is its client, after all) if it wants.
Yet in both cases, the beneficiary is not even meant to receive the funds.
Fraud works the same way: unless local law requires it, the beneficiary bank is not required to send the funds back, and can rely on beneficiary consent.