|
|
|
|
|
|
by perl4ever
2447 days ago
|
|
|
I think the two behaviors should be understood as arbitrary for illustrative purposes. The point is, as I understand it, that you can decide that one causal relationship exists and another does not, and derive a model consistent with that and with the observed statistics. Because, as people give lip service to constantly, but never seem to really adhere to, correlation is different from causation. |
|
|